Monday, February 20, 2017

New Horizons scientists want to redefine what planets are

Paste your parsed code here.
Paste your parsed code here.

Under the new definition, Pluto will get its former status back. But it’s not just Pluto that’ll change classifications: even moons will be recognized as planets. Based on the International Astronomical Union’s (IAU) current definition, an object can only be classified as a planet if it “(a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape and (c) has cleared the neighborhood around its orbit.”


Pluto was demoted because it doesn’t clear its orbit of asteroids and comets. Plus, it’s only around twice the size of its moon Charon. Stern thinks that’s “bullshit,” though, and he and his team argue that the current definition is technically flawed:


“First, it recognizes as planets only those objects orbiting our Sun, not those orbiting other stars or orbiting freely in the galaxy as “rogue planets.” Second, it requires zone clearing, which no planet in our solar system can satisfy since new small bodies are constantly injected into planet-crossing orbits, like NEOs near Earth. Finally, and most severely, by requiring zone clearing the mathematics of the definition are distance-dependent, requiring progressively larger objects in each successive zone. For example, even an Earth sized object in the Kuiper Belt would not clear its zone.”



It’s unclear if the team plans to formally submit their proposal to the IAU. But if they do and it gets approved, then we’ll potentially have hundreds of new planet names to memorize.

Paste your parsed code here.
Paste your parsed code here.

0 comments:

Post a Comment

infolinks

google analytics

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Last Hour Hits

Copyright © Tech Visions